Speaking of
the cost effectiveness of
kitchen gadgets, what do you think that your most and least used appliances/tools are? I know that I use my ice
cream maker quite often, though it was voted as the least cost-effective appliance. On a near-daily basis, I use my espresso machine and my oven, and I use my
toaster and blender less frequently. My stand mixer gets a good amount of use, too. I'm not going to work out the exact
cost per use, but I think that these have all paid for themselves.
In terms of least used items, my waffle iron only makes occasional appearances in my kitchen, but I got such a good deal on it that it could be considered "cost effective" even if I only used it twice. My slow cooker is an appliance that I want to use more often than I actually do, as well. Fortunately, I don't think I have anything that I have never used. I'm sure that that is more indicative of the fact that I cook a lot than the potential usefulness of the gadget.
I'm willing to bet that sometimes the least used things in the kitchen are some of the least expensive, like my waffle iron. Things that were expensive tend to motivate people, myself included, to use them in an attempt to justify the cost. If it seemed like too good a deal to pass up at the time, you probably didn't buy it because you actually needed it, like that 6th unusually shaped whisk or yet another cheese grater that is now collecting dust at the back of the pantry.

How many times have you come across a neat looking gadget or seemingly useful appliance at the store and
bought it, thinking that it would be useful? Maybe you rationalized your purchase by thinking , I always
wanted to make my own ice cream, or perhaps even something like, the toaster on the TV show I watched last
night looked just like this one and it made perfect toast! Not all kitchen gadgets are as costly, or as cost
effective, as they sound. Pricegrabber.co.uk did a study of the 





