Last fall, Congress passed legislation that ceased federal, tax-generated funding for the
inspections of facilities used to slaughter horses for human consumption. Because all facilities must be inspected to
operate, this effectively shut them down. They could not pay the inspection fees themselves. While not illegal in the
US to eat horse meat, it is a disgusting idea to many diners, so the horse meat produced was typically exported to
Japan or European countries, like France, Belgium and Italy.
This week, in response to aggressive lobbying efforts from pro-slaughter groups and the owners of the slaughtering plants, the Department of Agriculture amended its policy, which has essentially reversed the federal spending ban on equine slaughterhouse inspections by allowing the slaughterhouse inspection fees to be paid by the slaughterhouse or a third party. This means that they will once again be open for business. On of the congressional bill's sponsor's, said that the Department of Agriculture was "intent on going against what was very clearly the purpose of passing the amendment ... to end horse slaughter."
While there has been a great deal of controversy in the past over the treatment of horses destined for slaughter, the primary sticking point is whether horses should be considered to be companion animals, like cats and dogs, or livestock, like cows. The majority of people lean towards the former viewpoint, especially because almost all horses in the US are kept for pleasure and recreational purposes. This move on the part of the Department of Agriculture shows the pull of the slaughtering industry's money over both animal activists and popular opinion.
California is the only state to have a law completely banning the slaughter of horses for human consumption.

In response to ongoing talks of change to established pension plans, the Meat Hygiene Service (MHS)
union in the UK is considering a five-day strike. If a strike went ahead, the slaughterhouses throughout the country of
Scotland, where 150 members of the union are employed, would be forced to close - a move that would definitely hurt
small businesses and butchers whose customers look forward to picking up fresh products. There would be no alternative
to closing during a strike, because the 900-member MHS union inspects the conditions and quality of meat throughout the
production and packaging process. Serious safety and health issues could arise from improperly inspected meat. Sources,










