Imagine that you are considering dining at
a restaurant you have never been to before. If all your friends like it and the professional critics like it, chances
are reasonably good that so will you. When it comes down to it, though, your friends are not professional food
critics. Whose advice do you place more weight on -- the friend's or the word of the person who gets paid to
eat?
It is a difficult decision, because most people are inclined to trust the professional, the expert. As Sarah alluded to earlier, Jeffrey Steingarten said that he felt obligated to let go of his personal food preferences and hang-ups when he became a food critic. In order to see things from his perspective, to take from his reviews what he does, do we have to let go of our food preferences? Of course not. Everyone likes different things. The question is really why you would choose to take the "professional" recommendation. Their palate is likely to be different from your own, so why should it be a reliable source of advice for you?









