
Lots of people love a good piece of sashimi and nigiri sushi, and most of us are willing to pay more for a higher quality fish. The only question is whether or not you're getting what you paid for.
Last week there was an article in the New York Times about two teenage girls and their fish-y experiment. The students got 60 different samples of fish from 4 sushi restaurants and 10 supermarkets and sent them off to a lab in Canada. About 60% of the fish were mislabeled, and in general cheaper fish were masquerading as more expensive fish. Apparently no one knows what red snapper is.
There's a lot more science in the New York Times article, but what's really important is that so many people who should know what fish is what have been selling it under the wrong name. I'm sure that there are some unscrupulous vendors out there willing to make a quick buck, but I prefer to think that it's mainly just people making mistakes. What do you think about possibly paying more for cheaper fish?


In an effort to breed better pork, the USDA will give $10 million to the University of Illinois to obtain a draft
sequence of swine genome. The goal of the project is to create DNA-based tools to identify and propagate pigs that are
more resistant to disease, breed larger litters and produce leaner meat. It's worth noting that heirloom pork has
gained popularity, in part, because it isn't lean. The USDA isn't just seeking leaner pigs, but bigger, meatier pigs in
general. The project would also try to identify the ideal climates for different breeds of pig, thereby allowing the
animals to grow to their fullest potential. Work is scheduled to end in late 2007--the Chinese year of the pig.
The FDA is getting ready to approve a new genetically modified salmon which grows twice as fast as normal
farm-raised salmon. The trick is altering a gene that controls the production of growth hormones. The company behind
the technology is 









