Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Hot on HuffPost Food:

See More Stories
Tell us what you think for a chance at $1000!


Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution Season 2 Preview

Jamie's Food Revolution hits Los Angeles, CAPhoto: ABC / YouTube


Season 2 of Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution premieres Tuesday night at 8pm on ABC and from the looks of it, Oliver hasn't had an easy time convincing the 11 million residents of Los Angeles to improve their eating habits. In addition to being barred from entering L.A. public schools, Oliver has to deal with issues unique to such a large urban area -- such as the fact that it's easier to obtain "a gun, crack, or a prostitute" than a tomato in certain L.A. neighborhoods. Based on the preview clip below, the crusade in Los Angeles might make Oliver's struggles in Huntington, West Virginia (the location of season 1) look like child's play.



Filed Under: Television/Film, Celebrities
Tags: abc food revolution, food revolution, jamie oliver, jamie oliver food revolution

Sponsored Links

Reader comments (Page 1 of 1)

James

4-12-2011 @3:46PM James said... Easier to get a gun, crack or a prostitute than a tomato? Are these people effing serious? Is the fearmonger that stupid or ridiculous? Produce prices are skyrocketing, but it's still not impossible to find.

Watch Food Inc.
Reply

tara

4-13-2011 @12:17AM tara said... It is in the inner-city. They don't have fresh produce in many of the inner-city neighborhoods in LA. They have a liquor store on every corner, and as many pawn shops as you can possibly imagine, but to find any fresh produce or healthy food at all really, you have to travel outside of the inner-city and many can't do that because they are dependent upon public transportation. That's why so many poor people are fat....they have processed foods, pastas, and sweets. That really is almost all that is available to them. It may not be that way where you live, but it is that way in many parts of Los Angeles. That's simply a fact.

Sara

4-13-2011 @11:09AM Sara said... The crazies are running the asylum! Why are we allowing bureaucrats to dictate crap food for our kids? Is this how our tax dollars are being spent? I wouldn't eat that crap or feed it to my kids. I think it's time to clean house. Go Jamie Oliver!
Reply

Kristen

4-13-2011 @2:58AM Kristen said... As I'm not usually home to watch this program, I was (lucky?) enough to be home this evening and out of work for a couple days follwing the forceful removal of my upper wisdom teeth to catch this. Disgusting, but hardly something I wasn't aware of.

I've witnessed a kitchen manager of mine in the past using a "bleach solution" on expired fish/shellfish to "kill the smell". I'm sorry. Using bleach on expired fish does nothing for either the product nor the customer. I happened to complain to management, and refused to cook/serve it, and was promptly terminated.

Two months later the restaurant went under. Good riddance.

To all of you who think that the "cooks are out to get you", take it from me. Most of us worth our salt would not EVER serve to you something that we would not consume ourselves. Mistakes do happen, however, and send-backs to the kitchen are (well, in my 11 years of experience), not met with derision and/or retaliation, but the desire to get the proper meal out to the consumer as quickly as possible, to ensure a good experience. Personally, I found it crushing when a meal was sent back, because I strive to do my best for the patrons. However, in a busy kitchen, and with busy servers, things can go awry at times.
I understand that eating out these days is a luxury for many. As such, I'll do my best to cater to your desires. Many in my line of work share this viewpoint as well.

Please don't think that all of us who work in food-service are vindictive, terrible people who will spit in your mashed potatoes of you look at us sideways. It simply isn't true. I myself, personally, strive for a good, quality product put out to the customer in a timely basis. And I would like to think that this goes for the 99 percent of the rest of us in the Culinary business.

There are "bad apples" everywhere. Unfortunately, bad news circulates faster than good news does.

Cheers!

~Krissy~





My only

jon

4-12-2011 @10:44PM jon said... Maybe if the government would stop cutting funding to the schools, the schools wouldn't have to resort to cheap, processed foods for the schools. Kids eat, what, one meal a day at school, times 5 days a week, for about...25 or so days a month? What about the 65 other meals the kids eat?
Reply

ByTheNite73

4-13-2011 @3:55AM ByTheNite73 said... Jon, as I'm 35, it seems like school meals haven't changed a bunch since I was a kid. Pizza, tacos, "chicken" nuggets with fake mashed potatoes and gravy, "steak" and cheese subs that could be slathered with mayo, fries and tater-tots, yeah, this was considered a "staple" lunch back in the 80's-90's. Your only veg you could get, if you were lucky, was some canned corn that had gone gray after sitting in the steam table for hours on end.

I'm glad that there are steps being taken towards healthier foods in schools these days.

Go Jamie!


Liza

4-13-2011 @5:35AM Liza said... Jon, unfortunately, kids in impoverished neighborhoods are often given free breakfast and lunch at school. When I worked in the inner city, many of my students ONLY came to school (including Summer School), so they had something to eat. When you look at it through that lens, the school has a HUGE responsibility to feed our kids something--ANYTHING-- healthy. Sadly, it's just more cost effective to feed them junk, so this is what is done.

Try teaching kids who have been jacked up on sugar for breakfast, and are crashing by 9 am, then get refueled at lunch. You'd have better luck nailing jello to a tree.

Jennifer

4-13-2011 @3:35AM Jennifer said... I watched it tonight and was NOT surprised at all at the reactions of the board. If parents saw what was actually going in their kids mouths A LOT of people would lose their jobs on that board. FACT: If they cared one little bit, they would let him in and try to figure it out together! They are BLATANT in the fact they are hiding and lying to us! My kids go to LAUSD schools, they WILL NOT EVER EAT THIS CRAP!
Reply

ema

4-13-2011 @2:16PM ema said... It is fairly clear to me why Jamie was banned from entering all of the schools. The LA unified school district had 694,288 students attending their schools in the 2007-2008 school year. They are the second largest school district in our country. I admit, I have no idea how many kids brown bag it, but just for fun say that if around say 72% of these kids receive breakfast and lunch from the school, that would be nearly 500,000 kids. Two meals a day for the typical 180 school days a year for 500,000 kids is 180 million meals. Quite a cash cow for the companies who sell the processed food to our youth. It is no secret that they have a huge influence on politicians and policy making via their strong lobbying groups. There is no way in hell that these forces will allow anyone...especially someone with a camera crew and a nationally televised tv show in to see just how bad the "food" they provide our youth is and get people all riled up demanding the system to change. They've worked to hard for too long to get us all addicted to the crap they sell to allow that to happen. God forbid we actually find out what they have been feeding us.

Did you see the show that just aired? I had no idea about the allowance of "pink slime" laced with ammonia into our ground beef. That is disgusting! That's in our fast food burgers folks...did you know about it? I like to think I'm pretty well informed about things and I didn't have a clue! This really ticks me off...what else are they doing to our food that we don't know about?!?
Reply

Sara

4-13-2011 @5:38PM Sara said... Jamie does a good job of using examples and props, but
translating this problem down to $$ and cents might get
taxpayer's attention. How much does the school board
get paid? How much money is budgeted for school
lunches? How much money do they spend?
Taxpayers, it's time to start asking some questions.
Reply

Don Campbell

5-29-2011 @12:20AM Don Campbell said... 1. Law suits get attention in the USA-Any parents that feel poor lunches contributed to the child's health problelms-support them to sue the LA school district
2. Sue the LA school district that foods contain too many potential dangerous preservatives, flavorings, fillers, etc. Contact the PTA of every school.
3. Newspaper articles get attention
4. Some elem. schools that grow vegetables as class projects are not allowed to eat them in the school because companies have "contracts" as food providers.
Reply

11 Comments / 1 Pages

Most Popular Stories

  • FDA Still Struggling to Define

    FDA Still Struggling to Define "Gluten-Free"Read More

  • This Omelet Recipe Is Written On the Egg Itself

    This Omelet Recipe Is Written On the Egg ItselfRead More

  • Why Jewish Food Disappoints

    Why Jewish Food DisappointsRead More

Latest Flickr Feed


Sponsored Links