Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Hot on HuffPost Food:

See More Stories
Tell us what you think for a chance at $1000!


Starbucks vs. Dunkin': A New Breakfast Sandwich Taste Test

Photo: Elizabeth Hait, AOL


We're not exactly making a New Year's resolution to count our calories, but when we saw that both Starbucks and Dunkin' Donuts were launching two new "healthier" breakfast sandwiches this week, we took the bait. Here, the details and our panel's scorecard:

The Contenders: Starbucks' New Veggie Artisan Breakfast Sandwich vs. Dunkin' Donuts' Wake-up Wraps varieties (Egg White Turkey Sausage and Egg White Veggie).

The Claims: Starbucks' new Veggie, Egg, & Monterey Jack sandwich is, "an ... omelet with fire-roasted green and red peppers and diced onion topped with melted Monterey Jack cheese nestled in a hand-scored oven-toasted artisan roll." (350 calories)
Dunkin's Wake-Up Wraps "feature a five-inch tortilla filled with egg whites, turkey sausage, spinach, and reduced-fat cheddar cheese," and the Veggie Wake-Up Wrap has "egg whites, peppers, onions, mushrooms and reduced-fat cheese." (150 calories)

The Price: From January 4 (yes, that's today) through the 10th, Starbucks has a deal going: Buy one of their handcrafted beverages and get a Breakfast Sandwich for $2. Dunkin' Wraps sell for $1.29 each.

The Verdict: Starbucks Veggie ABS (Grade B-): Although the sandwich was fresh, and the bread was a better quality than the Dunkin' Wake-Up Wraps' tortillas (which were kind of hard), our panelists thought there was just too much bread, not nearly enough vegetables (we only had two or three peppers buried in each sandwich's egg), and it was bland. "More salt," begged one panelist. "More flavor!" When it came to the cheese, though, the Monterey Jack of Starbucks had an edge over Dunkin's low-cal cheese, which, said one panelist, "tasted like fake cheese food." Starbucks, add more vegetables and amp up the spice, please.

Dunkin's Wrap (Grade B+): Everyone on the panel agreed this wrap (which isn't really a wrap at all) had the kick you want in a breakfast sandwich. It was more highly spiced than the Starbucks Veggie ABS, and the sausage had good flavor. The tortilla, though, could use a remake. It tasted just a touch stale. Dunkin', we'll come back for the spice, and the low-cal ease, but freshen up the tortillas, please.

Filed Under: Taste Test, Fast Food
Tags: breakfast sandwiches, deals, starbucks

Sponsored Links

Reader comments (Page 1 of 1)

Seth

1-04-2011 @6:08PM Seth said... Just an FYI - An Egg McMuffin has 50 less calories and 6 grams less fat than the Starbucks "healthy" artisan veggie sandwich. Your much better off with their reduced fat turkey bacon egg white english muffin, or their spinach feta wrap.
Reply

Joel

1-06-2011 @11:24AM Joel said... Seriously, why would anyone want to eat all the processed and artificial crap they serve at the big chains?. Instead ,,why not opt for your locally owned independent cafe or coffeehouse.
The Coffee Club Cafe near my house in a Cleveland suburb has fantastic egg sandwiches!
They use REAL eggs, REAL cheese and the bagels and croissants they come on are fresh baked right out of of the oven. Absolute heaven. !! Boycott the corporate chains!!!l

KELLI2L

3-31-2011 @7:48AM KELLI2L said... But the Starbucks breakfast egg and ham or bacon sandwich (with that wonderful bread square) is DELICIOUS. . . .
Plus, I'm sick of these fast-food places that serve horrible bread buns that are like paste in you mouth and ever so flimsy and non-healthy. I've been waiting years for these places to up the bread quality, so I'm very pleased that Starbucks has stepped up to the plate..... and no one can beat their coffee in my opinion......

Elizabeth

1-05-2011 @9:16AM Elizabeth said... I'm a big fan of the Starbucks breakfast sandwiches, especially the black forest ham one. They're warm and tasty, and have enough protein and carbs (without overloading on calories) to carry me through my morning. I'm definitely planning on checking out the $2 sandwiches this week!
Reply

Cervelli

1-06-2011 @7:40AM Cervelli said... I just fell into the trap of the Starbuck's... I bit.... no veggies... I went back to the store and asked. "the veggies are inside", I was told... Hmmmm cracked it open in front of the barista.... Yep... inside alright.............ONE LONELY green pepper.... that was it, nothing more... good thing it was only $2... Not buying THAT again..
Reply

KELLI2L

3-31-2011 @7:57AM KELLI2L said... (imo) Sometimes the server or preparer is not watchful of what is tossed inside each food item; but I wouldn't blame this matter on Starbucks as a whole. You just got unlucky this one time. If this were to happen consistantly at the location you visited - - then complaints need to be made so they can make improvements......

robert

1-06-2011 @7:58AM robert said... went to my local starbucks and found that they are not offering the breakfast sandwiches saying they don't have an oven..maybe I could bring them a toaster over to heat the sandwich in...come on, lame excuse for not having a promotional item to offer
Reply

Koz

1-06-2011 @8:03AM Koz said... The first time I had Starbucks coffee was back a few years ago in Chicago s O Hair airport. It took me a few minute to explain what a coffee was and then they gave me a cup of black water and told me the cream and sugar was over there. That was the last time I ordered a Starbuck. I said ordered because one sip and I through it in the trash.
Large decaf extra extra at Dunkin get me just what I want.
Reply

Tony Carlos

1-06-2011 @9:02AM Tony Carlos said... If you take your coffee with "extra extra," it's no wonder you don't like Starbucks. The reality is you don't like coffee. You are drinking a coffee-flavored sweetened milk drink.

KELLI2L

3-31-2011 @7:57AM KELLI2L said... I never order plain coffee at Starbucks because they are 'known' for their Latte's etc., and in my opinion those Latte's are the best (a real 'treat'). . . . only once was I disappointed - when I was visiting in Georgia (and in a big box store) where they had a Starbucks. The server shorted the coffee shot - so the Latte was like tea. I complained - - they made me a new one - - and I never went back to that particular location ever again. But as a whole, Starbucks is consistently great on Latte's and the other specialty coffee drinks......

Nicole

1-06-2011 @9:38AM Nicole said... Did you taste the DD Wake-up Wraps or the Veggie Flatbread sandwich? From your post, it sounds like you tested the Veggie Flatbread, which is much more substantial than the wrap.

I love the DD Veggie Flatbread sandwich and have never been even remotely interested in trying the similar sandwich from Starbucks.
Reply

PeanutButter&Jenny

1-06-2011 @9:58AM PeanutButter&Jenny said... The D&D wake up wraps are a completely different menu item (which are actually wraps.) The items you reviewed are their egg white flatbread sandwiches (which are actually flatbread sandwiches.) Stellar journalism!
Reply

GENE KANOFSKY

1-06-2011 @10:41AM GENE KANOFSKY said... For a good, tasty breakfast sandwich, one should try Subways new menu. I don't know about calorie counts, but it taste good and has fresh veggies and eggs whites only.

Gene

Reply

KELLI2L

3-31-2011 @7:59AM KELLI2L said... Sorry, but Subway's breads are awful in my opinion. . . And I'm equally non-interested in the questionable fillings they call meat. . . I can't recall ever having such a tasteless sub !!! I tried a few different choices but all were void of taste or health.....(imo)

joey3quarters

1-06-2011 @11:31AM joey3quarters said... First both of these things stink nothing but 5 or 6 $ artery cloggers. Both stores stink over priced , big money for a littile sandwitch.
Reply

KELLI2L

3-31-2011 @8:04AM KELLI2L said... I beg to differ with you on price. While traveling and hungry - - I checked out the food area of the fuel stations / fast-food store. What a culinary disappointment and $pricey$ too. . . . everything was pre-packaged and pricey and the choices were deficient..... I think it was a shell station.

Luckily down the road a piece just before I hit the highway again, there was a tiny drivethru Starbucks. I checked out the menu and prices and order the ham and egg sandwich. The price was less than the fast-food (prewrapped) gas station choice AND bigtime delicious too...... I would have been willing to pay more for the fresher and healthier sandwich from Starbucks anyday. . .

iBombshell

1-06-2011 @12:18PM iBombshell said... Subway is healthier honestly and for the same price you get basically the same thing on your choice of bread and choice of cheese veggies ect. not to mention at the price of $2.50 you also get a 16oz of Seattle's Best coffee :]

Your argument is irrelevant, Starbucks robs you of money :]

Reply

Egglectic Cafe

1-06-2011 @2:52PM Egglectic Cafe said... Looking for a cozy Wheaton breakfast restaurant? I recommend Egglectic Cafe.
Reply

Checkers

2-08-2011 @8:34AM Checkers said... Did anyone bother to check the sodium on these sandwiches? North Americans consume FAAAAAR too much sodium in their diet. The Starbucks sandwich contains 25% of your daily sodium intake. The D&D contians 32%. My bet is it's in that so-called healthy turkey sausage. Turkey and chicken bacon and sausages contain far more salt than the same amount of pork bacon.
Reply

KELLI2L

3-31-2011 @8:05AM KELLI2L said... (imo) Subway subs would be greatly improved if they used a better quality BUN (sourdough, pumpernickle and rye sub breads); and Bore'sHead meats. . . . with a better tastier choice of cheese's AND I'd like to see meatballs, tuna and chicken salad filling added. . . If they made these changes I would try them again, if not - - they have lost me forever as a customer.

Reply

20 Comments / 1 Pages

Most Popular Stories

  • FDA Still Struggling to Define

    FDA Still Struggling to Define "Gluten-Free"Read More

  • This Omelet Recipe Is Written On the Egg Itself

    This Omelet Recipe Is Written On the Egg ItselfRead More

  • Why Jewish Food Disappoints

    Why Jewish Food DisappointsRead More

Latest Flickr Feed


Sponsored Links