Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Hot on HuffPost Food:

See More Stories
Tell us what you think for a chance at $1000!


New Food Stamp Pilot Enlists Discount Produce


There are currently two major concerns surrounding the country's food stamp program: does financial incentive (discounts) change people's eating habits? In other words, is obesity and other health deficiencies more common in low-income populations simply because healthier food costs more? The second is: how should the government help? A new incentive pilot program announced yesterday offers discounts for fresh produce, and it may be the government's biggest step towards clarity.

As The Boston Globe reports, The Agriculture Department awarded $20 million to Massachusetts and Abt Associates, Inc (a research firm in Cambridge) as part of its Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to temporarily grant thousands of Hampden County food stamp recipients with a 30-cent discount on every dollar spent on fresh produce. Out of the 50,000 households with food stamps in the county, these select families with then be tracked for 15 months to see how their health compares to food stamp recipients paying full price for produce. The program is estimated to start next fall.

This is not the first initiative to change the eating habits of low-income populations. Last week, The New York Times reported on health centers (also in Massachusetts) that are handing out produce prescriptions -- really, go have an apple a day -- now in the form of $1/day coupons to local farmers markets. In the 1980s, pregnant low-income residents received farmers market coupons for fear that children would develop malnourished, the Times reports.
Share

Democrats in the House recently expressed concern over the Senate's $4.5 billion child-nutrition bill as well the $26 billion state-aid package for Medicaid and educational funding. The latter would save teachers from being laid off before the new school year, but would take away funds for the food stamp program. Hence, the concern: how should the government help?

This new experiment, notes Agriculture Department undersecretary Kevin Concannon, is "one of the largest in the history of the Food and Nutrition Service... We have a lot of information on nutrition, we have a lot of information of health, but we have a lot less information on what influences behavior," reports The Boston Globe. Most of the grant money will go to the consulting firm to conduct routine surveys and research with the selected families in the program; the rest may go towards subsidies, equipment and administrative costs if the research shows that cheaper food does, in fact, always win.

Filed Under: Health & Medical, Food Politics
Tags: food stamps, fresh, nutrition

Sponsored Links

Reader comments (Page 1 of 13)

Kathlynal

8-21-2010 @12:21AM Kathlynal said... When I'm in the check out line behind someone with a cart full over the top of junk, invariably they pay with EBT. Hopefully some of these kids stuck on food stamps will get some fruit now.
Reply

virginia

8-22-2010 @10:29AM virginia said... carl,
dont be blaming obama for ebt! i dont like him myself,but he is not to blame for the food stamps.
where i live they have a place to buy produce pretty cheap.but you cannot pick it yourself and it comes in bulk. like 3 lb carrots for $1 or 3 doz lg eggs for $3.50.
but for a family it would work fine.
problem is they have these stores in the suburbs,not in the city where people actually need them.and they dont take ebt cards.
if someone would put hese up in urban areas,they could hire people to work and people could get fruit and veggies frot he kids.
btwe my daughter lives in jax,fl and my grandson buys lunch almost every day.he is autistic and likes to use his "credit card".
he eats a salad with chicken almost every day.sometimes the bp sammich or turkey sammich.and he buys or takes an apple or banana.
it is how he was taught to eat!

pd39

8-22-2010 @10:59AM pd39 said... Carl, things haven't changed much since I worked as a grocery clerk in the early 1970s. I would see people (I knew worked for cash) paying for high end steaks and roasts with food stamps, then waltz on over to our alcohol counter and pay cash for half-gallons of Jack Daniels, Glenfiddich, VSOP Courvoisier, and imported beers and tobacco products. I'd go home and slice up a 3 cent-a-pound onion and toss it into my pot of dried beans I made yesterday that had to last me one full week.

But then, nobody ever told me life was fair.

Appaloosa

8-22-2010 @11:58AM Appaloosa said... Carl, other than your blatant display of racist ignorance, you have a valid point. Use of food stamps should ONLY be used for healthy and nutitious foods. They also should be printed with the recients names on them.

Linda

8-22-2010 @12:04PM Linda said... Car.............l you could not be more spot on ...........................you are so right........I worked in the supermarkets for 25 years and ............the " people on welfare" do know how to work the systom. It does not matter if they change the program they will find a way to screw the tax payer. I call it free food day every 1st of the month....and stay away from the markets.

Melly

8-22-2010 @3:44PM Melly said... Of course there will always be people who know how to manipulate the system, no matter what you do. However, I'd say those people who misuse EBT are in the minority, rather than the majority.

Carl, Obama has nothing to do with the EBT system, it was in place long before he was in office. So your little BTB saying is really out of line. And Carl, homeless people are exempted from the whole hot foods issue, they are even allowed to purchase meals at some fast food restaurants, because they do not have refridgerators to hold supermarket purchases.

I'm sure most people think the majority who are using the food stamp program are black, but white people still make up the majority of the population, and thus make up the majority of welfare users as well. Which, technically food stamps are not welfare, cash aid is welfare. There is a limit on the amount of years you can use welfare, but not food stamps.

I can see frustration at the people who misuse the system, but many do not. In these current economic times, many who have never used SNAP or welfare have had to do so.

There are many places you can get produce at a reasonable price, you just have to look around. Most of these stores also accept EBT. Even Costco accepts EBT now. Henry's has great produce at a great price. The best deal in my area for produce is at a swap meet, but it only occurs every other week, and of course they wouldn't be accepting EBT either. Also, I think EBT pays for seeds so you can grow your own produce. They should let them buy those topsy turvy things lol. So people in the inner cities could at least grow their own fresh tomatoes, if they were inclined to.

mark

8-22-2010 @3:30PM mark said... I agreee and if they will stop accepting these at gambling establishments around the country they could kill off the abuse and terrible waste.

julie

8-22-2010 @10:07PM julie said... I have also been in the checkout line behind people whose carts are full of soda, chips, boxes of snack cakes and frozen fried chicken. The person pays with a EBT card and I wonder where the fruits, vegetables and lean meats are. Many times, the person purchasing these items have young children with them who are overweight, and looking at the food that is purchased, I can see why. Personally, I feel that junk food and soda should not be covered by EBT. From my observations, many of the foods that are being purchased with EBT are empty calories that are not providing the nutrition that children need to stay healthy. Thank goodness that others are seeing this too and are trying to address this problem.

peopleagainstmorons

8-22-2010 @10:43PM peopleagainstmorons said... i used to live in detroit, and the scams with food stamps were rampant! before they had the cards, individuals woul buy 2 lemons with a $20.00 food stamp, pocket the change, then go next door to the liquor store and buy beer or hard liquor. maybe food should be supplied to food stamp recipients to ensure that their families are getting what they need.

tracer

8-23-2010 @1:10PM tracer said... Anyone who stands in line st the super market to begrudge another of what they eat or how they pay for it NEEDS A LIFE SERIOUSLY. Hopefuly when your anorexia frame falls down from lack of food some fat hungry dog will eat your brain. LKAO@Stewpidity

lee

8-20-2010 @3:06PM lee said... glad it's here in MA. Now we'll be able to see just how many really buy food (not sell) their stamps!!
Reply

Al Schrader

8-20-2010 @4:47PM Al Schrader said... Today's hybrid crops suck the nutrients right out of the soil. So, I have to replace them or I get miniature corn & miniature watermelons, etc or even nothing. The nutrients are nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium which are sold in 33 pound sacks. When you combine the cost of this with water,
plowing, cultivating, picking, & shipping, I have to get 50 cents for a tomato just to break even which means you have to pay about a dollar for it in the supermarket. That's just to break even.

steverc53

8-22-2010 @8:11PM steverc53 said... Don't believe everything you read here

ruthsgardens

8-20-2010 @3:07PM ruthsgardens said... It would be a lot easier and cheaper if the government would stop subsidizing rich farmers to not grow.During the great depression, 25% of working americans were farmers.To get control of food prices the government began to subsidize farmers to not grow.And it worked.The problem is they never stopped the subsidizing.Poorer farmers could not afford the modern equipment to compete with the richer farmers because of the subsidies.So they folded one by one and moved to the cities to join the rest of the unemployed which extended the depression.But now only 1% of working americans are farmers.And they are the richer ones.These richer farmers lobby washington to keep these subsidies going.They are used as a welfare check for good,bad crop years.Back then the supply was high and the demand low.Now the supply is low and the demand is high.With China,India and Russia jacking up the demand with higher population, our government still subsidize rich farmers to not grow.Where once we fed the world,now we import all of our food.And oil, and steel etc.The requirements of a super giant is agricultural,steel industries,automotive industries and oil industries.Without those our country will be reduced to a 3rd world country.With all presidents and both parties still subsidizing the rich to nopt grow is keeping the rich farmers rich but outsourcing all of the rest of our demand.If a president and a party in congress,doesn't matter which,stops subsidizing rich farmers to not grow and begin to subsidize new farmers to grow, it would not only lower food prices.It would return 25% of working americans back to farms.That would bolster our steel industries to supply new piping for irrigation and desalinization plants to.It would bolster our auto and tractor groups creating more equipment.Our country would return from being an export nation to an import nation.With the swipe of a pen.Why don't they do it?Ask them.It is because of the presidents and congresses own self contingent interests in the matter that they care about.They don't have nothging to lose.Why should they care?
Reply

lin

8-20-2010 @5:46PM lin said... ruth you need to read a little more. farmers were paid to idle land for periods from 10 to 15 years. this was to give the land a rest, provide cover for wildlife and reduce erosion. the payments in ohio were just enough to cover the fuel for the required mowing. the farm bill that everyone screams about-food stamps, school lunches and several other free or low cost food programs take the majority of the money allocated in that farm bill.

Aerin

8-22-2010 @1:00PM Aerin said... Lin: I am sorry to burst your bubble, but there are a number of millionaire "farmers" who make a superb life on farm subsidies. There are a couple of sugar growers in Florida who are multi-millionaires on NOT producing a crop and a television anchorman who's personal retreat is maintained on farm subsidy money. There are any number of others.

Florence Brooks

8-22-2010 @9:14PM Florence Brooks said... "Most Americans" do not want to work on farms, It is hot and hard work. They can get more sitting on their fat butts, in the subsidized housing with the food stamps and medicaid, watching the soaps and playing with their cell phones. In schools, the "entitled" and subsidized pick on the farm kids, who are probably the smartest, hardest working and most responsible and self sufficient people they actually know.

wgraves

8-20-2010 @4:19PM wgraves said... If you could buy your child a piece of fruit for 25 cents a day everyone would do it. Period. It is right now cheaper to eat junk than to eat healthy. Soft drinks with corn syrup being an example. Instead of a study to determine if we should make healthy food cheaper to see if it helps let's just do it and study the market result of sales increases. Do it now, talk about it later. Let's get the ball rolling. Someone please get Mrs. Obama on to this now. She's one smart lady.
And PLEASE, no more pizza, corn dogs or chicken nuggets on school menus. And make it real food, not some overprocessed dehydrated crud.
Reply

Mark

8-20-2010 @8:52PM Mark said... I know exactly what your talking about, a few months ago a friend and i were getting drinks for a 2 hour road trip. We were grossed out to see the store brand "Sunny D equvilent" which you would think had some amount of Oragne juice in it was actually CHEAPER then WATER!!! Even the generic no brand bottled water. High Frucose Corn Syrup anyone?

nana7

8-22-2010 @8:37AM nana7 said... Most high schools have salad bars but kids on free/reduced lunches aren't allowed it.. They are forced to eat the processed junk. Also if you send them with a packed lunch they can't have milk unless they pay for it.. Also if it weren't for fast food places most people would starve. For over 4 yrs. I have watched kids grow up. I see the same people in 1-3 times a day.. If you eat hash browns/rounds all you are eating is grease.. What is wrong with a bowl of cereal, unsweetened, for breakfast, and a peanut butter and jelly sandwich for lunch? A lot healthier for your kids then burgers/nuggets..

243 Comments / 13 Pages

Most Popular Stories

  • FDA Still Struggling to Define

    FDA Still Struggling to Define "Gluten-Free"Read More

  • This Omelet Recipe Is Written On the Egg Itself

    This Omelet Recipe Is Written On the Egg ItselfRead More

  • Why Jewish Food Disappoints

    Why Jewish Food DisappointsRead More


Sponsored Links