Photo: David Giesbrecht / Bravo
This week marks the return of Slashfood's exclusive exit interviews with the latest Top Chef contestant to get the boot. In an effort to prevent spoilers, we've included the text after the jump.
From the start, Miami based chef Andrea Curto-Randazzo stood out as one of the more brash, opinionated contestants in the Top Chef: D.C. bunch -- immediately after Episode 1, she posted "Just Sayin'," a YouTube video responding to host Padma's critique of her food (which has since been removed). As the season progressed, the producers started to show a more charming side of Andrea after she won Episode 4's "Room Service" elimination challenge. On Episode 5's Quickfire, Andrea was confronted with her Miami rival Michelle Bernstein, who judged her food to be less than appealing -- faced with that embarrassing criticism, she remained as poised as she was vulnerable.
In the end, the judges had issues with her pan-seared swordfish and its overpowering vanilla-mustard beurre blanc.
Slashfood spoke with Andrea about the now infamous "peagate," being confronted with Bernstein and the inspiration behind the curious white maple gravy she served with the miniature chicken and waffles.
This week's episode was like that movie Clue -- a classic "whodunit" – except everyone kind of knows who did it.
ACR: Actually, it was me. I took [the pea purée] and gave it to Alex because I thought he needed a little help.
How nice of you.
ACR: Just kidding.
Well did he take it or not? What's the vibe?
ACR: You know, I don't know. Everyone is innocent until proving guilty. I can't say that I actually saw him take it. All I know is that I never saw him make pea purée and I know that Ed had pea purée and at the end it was on Alex's plate. That is as much as I know. I saw the poll on Bravo last night and the viewers were 90% sure. So you can go with that.
Okay, I'll go with that very scientific polling. You unfortunately got dismissed for a vanilla issue. What's worse: over-salting or over sweetening with vanilla?
ACR: I guess on that show, over sweetening is worse. It's a judges table and in their minds vanilla was the loser, so I pack my knives and go. You know what I mean? It can go any way.
Speaking of judging, last week Michelle Bernstein, someone who you're familiar with judged you -- is that fair?
ACR: You know, I don't know that it's really fair. I was surprised to see her there and a little bit uncomfortable. I don't know if someone can judge fairly in that situation. It was what it was and when you sign up to play this game, anything can happen. It's beyond my control. But it definitely made me a bit uncomfortable. Did I deserve to be in the bottom three on that Quickfire challenge? In my mind, no. In many people's minds, no.
Every contestant probably has a rivalry at some point, but you don't see people really deal with it in that situation.
ACR: Yeah. What can I say. I didn't hide it, I'm not that kind of person. I don't know that it was very fair but I don't make the rules. It's over.
Last night you made some chicken and waffles -- they looked like one of the best things out there.
ACR: I thought so. I mean who doesn't like chicken and waffles?
I don't know...insane people?
ACR: You know, who thought a cucumber cup could go on a toothpick either? I learn new stuff every day.
Can you tell a little about the sauce you made, the maple white gravy?
ACR: It was thinking "biscuits and gravy" and going with the whole southern vibe. That was the idea of it. Sometimes you just pull stuff from out of nowhere.
Were there dishes you cooked that you thought were great but were overlooked?
ACR: You know, I've been doing this for years. I'm pretty confident in my ability to cook. At the barbecue, I thought my dish was awesome and so did the people who ate it and so did my colleagues. But it kind of got passed over. It's all about the people who are judging it and what they prefer. I can't go back and second guess. I keep my dignity intact. I have so much going on in my life --Top Chef, albeit a very interesting experience, is a really small piece of who Andrea Curto-Randazzo is.
Have you seen a spike in business this summer?
ACR: A little. At Talula, here in South Beach, it's just so seasonal and in the summer it's dead anyways. So it's hard to gauge. But I do have some people coming in because of the show and the new restaurant that I'm at, The Water Club, I have people coming in just to see me. People would notice me around; at first it was a little uncomfortable because I dig my privacy. It's really nice and I guess I just got a big taste of how popular the show is. I'm one of those contestants who didn't watch the show prior, so I guess I never realized it. I kind of wished I had, because everyone else on the show seemed to have been for years.
I remember after the first episode, you posted a response video -- did you get in trouble for that?
ACR: I can't talk about that.
Did you try anyone else's dishes, something you thought was killer?
ACR: I did from time to time, try other people's dishes. I can't remember anything in particular that stood out, but I did get a good gauge of who can do what and whose restaurants I would like to eat at.
















7-31-2010 @6:30PM Eileen said... My only problem with Andrea is her hair. I wouldn't eat in a restaurant where the chef has her hair hanging in her face.
Reply
8-01-2010 @1:28AM Richard Meeks said... This is probally the lamest seaon of TOP CHEF.In all fairness though,the Las Vegas season is hard to live up to.
Reply
7-31-2010 @4:26PM alfredschrader said... Where I work makes this guy look like a Disney character. Then again I prepare food for people like Hillary Clinton or Faith Hill, etc. I've seen people cry, upchuck in the trash, go out for a cigarette & never come back not even for their pay, you name it.But, if I make, say, a Smoked Salmon tray for Tim McGraw it's a masterpiece....Alfred-
Reply
8-02-2010 @11:18AM Paulette said... Have you ever eaten at Kelly Liken's in Vail? I have several times. The restaurant always receives such raves, that I keep thinking it must be us. We were so dissappointed the first time a few years ago, but kept returning, as I said thinking we were way off base on this; or perhaps just had a bad evening. But no, every year the food is so below par..stale desserts. Bizarre cocktails and boring entrees. Kelly always gets glowing reviews in Wine Spectator and so on, I don't think they ever actually eat there and just think it is cool to support her. The tables are crammed together..service is lousy...forgetting silverware..having to request water and so on. I suppose because she is a young female she keeps getting promoted. Now that I see her smoking on TV, I suppose her taste buds are affected. Don't dine here. There are so many other fine restaurants in Vail. She can't leave Top Chef soon enough for us. Kelly please get back to the kitchen and prepare, I know you can do it..
Reply
7-31-2010 @5:30PM Melissa said... On this season of Top Chef, I haven't seen anyone really shine. I haven't heard any of the judges say, "that food is out of this world, it's the best I've ever had". Last season was great and several others before. I think I liked season 1 and 2 best. I will say that it must be very difficult to compete with others on live TV. It takes a lot of guts. Good luck to the rest of the contestants. May the best person win.
Reply
7-31-2010 @5:44PM rochemat said... Al,
Are you like "the Great Imposter"?? You seem to have experience in every occupation of every blog that is posted. Is the "guy" you're referring to the "pea puree poacher"? How's come you're not cooking at "l"affaire Chelsea" today...or, my mistake, maybe you are, and maybe you're the head chef, yeah that's the ticket. LOLOLOLOL!!!
Reply
7-31-2010 @6:41PM Kerry Hansen said... Get a new set of judges and the subjective opinions would be different in many cases. This is not Engineering.
Reply
7-31-2010 @7:39PM rochemat said... You know, you are right, howerver, this is a subjective occupation. Creativity is always subject to observation and opinion.
7-31-2010 @9:04PM TONI said... I think the judges need to find out the mystery of the pea puree. If someone did take it, they should be disqualified immediately!! The winner won because of the puree, if it wasn't his cooking get rid of the little sneaky guy!!!
Reply