The new Slashfood.
We know you rely on Slashfood for breaking food news, smart takes on food trends, recipes, reviews and chef interviews you won't find anywhere else.
And now, after our first ever redesign of this blog (launched in July 2005), you can easily find your favorite content. The new look brings even more luscious food photography to the table and and lets us show off contributions from some of the most exciting, opinionated writers in the business.
As the new executive editor of AOL Food and Slashfood, I could not be more excited to come on board during this particular time in Slashfood's history. The possibilities are endless, and we want to know what you'd like to see and what you think of our new look.
Dig in!

'Undercover Boss': Top 4 Moments From Season 4 [VIDEO]
Las Vegas Court Officials Accused Of Covering Up Sex Assault [VIDEO]
Walmart vs. Costco: How Do They Really Compare?
Groomers Lose Dog, Claim Not Responsible
Oklahoma man allowed to sue state over native american rain god on license plate
The Story Behind Shapewear: From Girdles to Spanx
'Grease' Cast: Where Are They Now?
Microsoft E3 2013 Xbox liveblog!
Living in a Van Was the Best Financial Decision I Ever Made
7 Myths of Long-Term Care








12-17-2009 @3:48PM Jimmy V said... love it!
Reply
12-17-2009 @8:49PM gobo said... Fantastic! A terrific new look, a thousand times better... and the message boards work now! The site's bright and beautiful. Kudos to the whole team!
Reply
12-18-2009 @9:27AM Dan said... I like the look...but I dont like how few articles are on each page. While I understand why, I still dont like it
12-18-2009 @10:49AM anibal.rosado said... love it! Can't come to this site now when I am hungry!!!
Reply
12-19-2009 @8:52AM RJ said... Terrible. Hard to navigate and I noticed that the articles are showing up twice for some? Yuck.
Reply
12-19-2009 @7:50PM Steph said... Sorry, I don't like it - actually I hate it. What 3 stories per page? The number of times a page is going to have to completely load for me to read everything current is a SERIOUS turn off.
Reply
12-20-2009 @1:59PM Branwyne said... HATE IT! It is hard to navigate, I don't like the style. Can't you bring back the old format?
Reply
12-22-2009 @10:48PM Treeb said... I don't like the new layout! The page is too crowded with different things, and not nearly enough articles on one page. So annoying to have to keep clicking to go to the next page just to see a couple more articles.
Reply
12-24-2009 @8:53PM tim said... Whoever designed this layout ruined a perfectly good site. There are way too many non-article-related items on each page. The articles should speak for themselves, who needs all the retweet/facebook/myspace/etc thingies? The "tag" and "file under" text shouldn't be as prominent/distracting as they are now. And why do the editors need a picture that big, or of any size for that matter? And why so little articles per page?
I liked the "amateurish" look of the old site, it gives a reliable feel to the material posted. Oh well.. it's still about the articles, and I expect they stay the great quality read they've usually been.
Reply
12-25-2009 @6:43PM arasmus2 said... Horrible! Over used ad space and not a quality blog anymore, lots of useless info and only 3 posts per page! About the only good thing maybe is the sorting of recipes at the top of the page. Down with the corporateness of AOL
Reply
12-31-2009 @5:23PM David Grant said... I agree with the above. WAY too many articals per page and thus WAY too many page loads.
Bring back the old design, at least as an option for those of us who hate the new one.
Reply