In the interest of diminishing their carbon footprints, a few hardy souls on the frontier of the sustainable living movement have decided to ditch their refrigerators, reports The New York Times. Although 99.5 percent of American homes have at least one fridge, anti-fridge advocates say they make do just fine without. One couple lives with just a small freezer and a cooler, kept chilled by two frozen soda bottles of water, which are rotated back to the ice chest when they begin to melt. I guess this would work OK, assuming you're home enough to rotate the bottles regularly - that might but a damper on your social life ("Oh, I'd love to stay, but I've got to go home and rotate the ice bottles!"). They say fridge-free living makes them more conscious of what they eat, relying less on packaged foods and planning ahead more so that meat from the freezer has time to defrost.
Others say the inconvenience and expense is not worth it, especially since no fridge equals extra trips to the grocery store equals more driving. Plus, being able to buy and store food in bulk is often cheaper and less wasteful than buying smaller packages more frequently. And Energy Star fridges don't actually use up that much energy as far as household appliances go - far less than clothes dryers. "I think a lot of people in the environmental movement have a romanticized idea about living like a pioneer," says Deanna Duke, a Seattle-based eco blogger. "But moving icepacks around and rotten food doesn't have the same romantic appeal as hanging your clothes on a line."
I do think Americans tend to store too much stuff in the fridge. In Europe and Asia, eggs are never refrigerated, nor are many kinds of cheeses. Ditto for tomatoes and many other fruits and veggies - refrigeration actually kills their flavor and texture. If we refrigerated less we might be able to have smaller, more efficient fridges.
What do you think? Could you live without a fridge?














