As I've probably mentioned once or twice, I'm not the biggest fan of Starbucks. Even at the best of times, their comforting cafes, sweet snacks and complicated drinks give me a slight sense of unease; after all, while Starbucks feels like a warm, friendly place, it doesn't take much imagination to recast it as a 21st century opium den. Beyond that, there is also the question of price: somehow, it seems obscene to pay $4 for a cup of coffee, regardless of how much whipped cream and crumbled gingerbread is mixed into it.With that in mind, I was impressed by the Good Earth Brew at Home Pledge. The organic coffee producer is asking consumers to make their morning coffee at home; in fact, for the first 20,000 people who pledge to do so, the company has promised to donate $1 to the Trust for Public Land. In addition to inspiring more people to buy coffee, the pledge should also go a long way toward reducing landfilled garbage: according to Good Earth, paper coffee cups account for 100 million pounds of uncompostable trash per year. Moreover, brewing at home should save the average consumer $1200 per year.
Yesterday, I had the opportunity to discuss Good Earth coffee with Cheryl Burn, their Director of Quality and Product Development. As the person most responsible for Good Earth's organic coffee line, she has been tasked with creating coffees that are flavorful, environmentally responsible, and reasonably priced. I was surprised to discover that, while they are committed to environmental sustainability, Good Earth's primary consideration was the flavor of their coffee. This made a lot of sense; after all, if the coffee isn't flavorful, then there isn't really a whole lot of reason to drink it. While some consumers are willing to suffer for the environment, coffee is an almost sacred experience and bad coffee is a really tough sell!
Luckily, Good Earth's blends are delicious. I tried the dark roast "Mystic" mix and the medium-roast "Sienna." Although the Sienna was delicious, with a mild, almost vanilla taste, I vastly preferred the intense, rich flavor of the dark roast. In both cases, I was impressed to find that Good Earth was as good or better than the non-organic coffees that I usually drink. When I discussed this with Cheryl, I learned that, instead of relying on a single varietal bean, Good Earth blends several different coffees from around the world. By doing so, they are able to ensure that the coffee flavor is consistent, even when the supply of organic coffees may vary.
Good Earth charges $7.99 for a ten-ounce bag of their coffee, which puts it in range of most premium coffees, and makes it less expensive than many organic coffees, including Newman's Own. Moreover, their commitment to the environment even extends to their packaging, which is partially constructed from a renewable, cornstarch-derived resin. While they're continuing to push the boundaries of environmentally-sustainable coffee, it's nice to know that Good Earth is working to ensure that the flavor, as much as the sustainability, will keep customers coming back!










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-24-2008 @ 6:09PM
Greg Sherwin said...
Not to be snide, but this post comes off pretty much as an advertising puff piece for a single merchant.
There are countless options for consumers to get high quality coffee that's also concerned about the sustainability of both the environment and the socio-economic issues of global trade. Pretty much all of what goes under the Direct Trade moniker fills that profile. Quality comes first with many of these sources.
As for the point about relying on blends rather than single origin coffees, it's true that the single origins are in vogue now -- much like the single malt scotches of the past decade. But consumer tastes change with time. Good Earth is using a common justification for why they may not be following the fickle trendiness of consumers.
And isn't it odd that a $4 bucket of pumpkin-pie-flavored Cool Whip seems obscene, and yet people are demanding that their coffees be environmentally sound, follow Fair Trade practices, that café employees receive living wages and health insurance, etc. I'm not sure how everyone expects all of that to be paid somehow. The price of a retail coffee mostly goes towards labor costs, not ingredients.
Reply
9-24-2008 @ 6:17PM
Bruce Watson said...
Greg-
Fair enough on all points. On the other hand, I actually tried this coffee and I found it to be pretty delicious. While I'm neither looking for nor expecting any coffee company to offer the cure to all the world's ills, I was impressed with Good Earth's commitment to the environment, willingness to donate money to conservation, and product quality. While I was very positive, I wouldn't say nice things about this company and its products if I didn't sincerely believe them.
You make a good point about Cool Whip versus coffee. Perhaps the reason for this is the fact that Cool Whip comes from a chemical plant, while coffee comes from farms in foreign countries. As one of the more prominent examples of global trade in the average home, it probably gets an outsize level of attention.
Reply
10-30-2008 @ 12:29PM
Brian Hartmann said...
This is a horrible display of pr. If you did any investigation on this company, Good Earth, you would realize that their parent company, Tata is a huge human rights abuser. See this article below.
http://www.bhopal.net/tata_rapsheet.html
I am tired of the lack of transparency in these companies who think they can clean themselves with their product launches of fair trade products. Why don't you ask these people in India and Bhopal about "Fair Trade".
Sorry but when I saw this piece, I had to respond. I think this company is shameful in how they are trying to convince us that they are helping the evironment.
Reply