Spoilers! Spoilers!Last night's episode of Top Chef finally addressed the question that show has been toying with all season: Is it better to sidestep the rules and create an amazing dish, or to follow the rules and produce something mediocre? Until this episode, it seemed to me that the judges went with whichever answer matched up with the contestant who they wanted to send home (my mom accurately likened it to a card trick where you know the card before the trick starts, then "find" it through whatever means). But now they have finally established that a better dish is more important than one that follows the rules closely, and I hope for the sake of consistency that they stick by this for the rest of the season. Oh yeah, and the Elimination Challenge was nuts.But before we talk about the main event, let's have a little dessert first. The Quickfire Challenge was simple: Create a delicious dessert. The chefs were nervous given the history of desserts on the show (they have sent a number of contestants home), but I found that the desserts for the challenge looked delicious (not quite as delicious, however, as the gorgeous dessert buffet in the kitchen that had nothing to do with the actual competition). Richard, demonstrating that he is "not a one-trick pony," won for scallop bananas with guacamole. I know -- huh? It wasn't as pretty as some of the other dishes, but Padma and guest judge Johnny Iuzzini both raved about it. Dale's halo halo ice dish looked refreshing and exciting, and also placed among the top dishes.
After finishing the Quickfire, Padma did not announce the Elimination Challenge -- a sure indicator that something was up. She informed the contestants that they would get a chance to go out to an improv comedy club that night, and I immediately remembered the episode from last season when they told the chefs to go out one night in Miami, and instead made them cook for everyone else who was clubbing. Fortunately, the chefs didn't have to cook for a room full of comedy club attendees, but they did receive the instructions for their Elimination Challenge at the club. Audience members shouted out words that the comedians arranged into 5 courses for the chefs to create -- courses like "orange, turned-on, asparagus" and "perplexed, green tofu." I loved the idea -- the "inspirations" were hilarious, and everyone involved acknowledged the absurdity of it all.
The contestants split themselves up into teams that appeared to be based on friendships (maybe with the exception of Nikki and Mark). Spike and Andrew -- team yellow vanilla love -- were quick to join up, and the duo decided to go utterly improv. They didn't plan their dish in advance, but interestingly ended up making the same thing that Spike wanted to make a few challenges back: butternut squash soup. Even though the two aren't my favorites, I have to admit that the soup looked incredible, and I'm sure that the vanilla creme fraiche added a beautiful complexity to such a warm and comforting dish. The judges loved it as well, but ultimately gave the win to Richard and Dale for their green perplexed tofu, which they marinated and grilled in beef fat and topped with green curry.
So four men made the top four, and four girls were stuck in the bottom: Jennifer and Stephanie for their menage a trois of orange turned-on asparagus and Antonia and Lisa for their drunk purple polish sausage, for which they improvised a chorizo with sea bass. Hence the question: Is it better to make a good-tasting dish that ignores the rules, or a lesser dish that follows them? In deciding that taste is the most important, the judges sent home Jennifer. It wasn't too surprising, and all of the chefs acknowledged that really all it takes is one minor slip -- Jennifer's was a piece of bread that the judges deemed just too much.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-24-2008 @ 10:36AM
pedantic said...
Let's look at the dishes in the elimination challenge:
Green perplexed tofu: It was definitely green and tofu was the centerpiece. It was also unusual which helped with the perplexed part. Oh. And it tasted good.
Yellow love vanilla: The soup was yellow, and it did incorporate vanilla. Was vanilla the star of the dish? no. And did it incorporate love? I'm not quite sure. But it tasted good, and that's why they were in the top two.
Purple Depressed Bacon: Not very purple. Not very depressed. But there was bacon, even though the pork tenderloin was the centerpiece. No complaints about the taste.
Magenta Drunk Polish Sausage: Not very magenta, and a small bit of tequila doesn't make it drunk, and chirzo isn't polish. Taste wise it was okay.
Orange Turned-On Asparagus: The goat cheese was orange, and they felt they needed to do many orange (fruit) things too, along with the asparagus. But there were many complaints all around. The bread. the orgy of flavors.
Top two, are obviously there for tasting the best. I think the Tofu did a better job with the task, but Vanilla attempted to do something.
Taste wise, the next two are Bacon and Polish Sausage. The Bacon team had bacon... The Polish Sausage team had chirzo... Back to this in a second.
Asparagus did the requirements relatively well, but didn't have good tasting food.
The choice for bottom two. Were two fold. Asparagus because they tasted worse. And Polish Sausage for making only an okay dish and not following the directions very well.
I would have gotten rid of Asparagus too. If you are not going to follow the rules, you need to hit it out of the park. Otherwise you risk being eliminated, but is that a bigger crime then making the least tasty dish? I think not.
Reply