The LA Times ran a piece yesterday on blogs becoming a new tool in many chefs' arsenals, and how they're entering a blogosphere that used to be reserved for us commonfolk. The difference, according to the author? Primarily, style and choice of content: commonfolk tend to "natter about what they fed their boyfriends last night, and fuzzily photograph their latest batch of heart-shaped cookies" while REAL chefs tell the stories behind the food, taking more time to detail the food's inspiration and its history.I beg to differ. I'm biased, yes, but I think our Slashfood Flickr group is a perfect example of primarily amateur photographers and chefs taking outstanding photos of food, ones just as good as any in a cookbook. And I think people read food blogs to take in the "nattering" about day-to-day life and how it fits in with what fix and eat. And chef's blogs can be personal, too - they don't all fit neatly into one (bread) box, as this author seems to imply.
The article details several chef blogs that have been making waves, and how the chefs are using their platforms to make a statement. For some chefs, like Alison Barshak, a blog is a way to show off and advertise your new restaurant under the guise of giving viewers a tutorial on opening up an eatery. For others, like Michael Laiskonis, blogs are a chance to describe eloquently, albeit verbosely, how they got the inspiration and found the ingredients for their extravagant meals.
The amusing part to all of this strict separation of professional chefs vs. amateurs in the blogging world? Shh - many of the chefs don't even write their own blogs! They add some content, sure, and probably review them before they go live, but most professional chefs - if they are as professional as they claim to be - don't have the time or the energy to keep and regularly update their own blogs. That's not to say that some don't write every word of their blogs, and take all of the photos, but many rely on ghostwriters to write their blogs, just as they do their cookbooks.
So, to take the amateur vs. professional idea to another level, I've decided to inject a bit of humor into my post via the Chef image. 'Cause everyone - professional chefs, amateur bloggers, and especially me - needs to lighten up sometimes.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-13-2008 @ 11:14AM
ericamklein said...
Wow, talk about a condescending article. My favorite food blogs are written by amateur chefs, and I love them because they have great photos and background stories, not just because the food is good.
Most of the time I avoid the professional chef blogs because I tend to expect them to operate more as self-advertising than anything else. That's not what I'm looking for in a blog. I mean, its great that they're jumping on the bandwagon, because obviously some of their blogs ARE good, but its pretty crappy to just assume that they'll be better because they're written by professionals.
Reply
3-13-2008 @ 11:15AM
Chef Alison Barshak said...
We are a very small local restaurant with a very loyal, interested & dedicated following. The blog(www.alisonatbluebell.wordpress.com) is not, and was never meant to be, anything but an extension of my personal relationship with my customers and the local community. Chef Alison Barshak
Reply
3-13-2008 @ 3:38PM
Julie said...
I think we all contribute something unique to be enjoyed by many. I disagree with the amateur thing most of the food bloggers out there are terrific cooks creating delicious food fit for any table. Besides, I haven't always liked the food at some restaurants that have "Professional Chefs" in the kitchen.
http://noshtalgia.blogspot.com/
Reply
3-13-2008 @ 6:08PM
Elayne Riggs said...
I tend to think they write more than you think they do. Yes, a chef's life is demanding and grueling, but no more so than a lot of other professionals who blog.
Reply