Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Hot on HuffPost Food:

See More Stories
Tell us what you think for a chance at $1000!


$1.99 chardonnay better than others in California

Charles Shaw wineWho says that you have to spend $90 for a good bottle of wine? Or even $20?

A 2005 Charles Shaw Chardonnay, aka "Two Buck Chuck," was named the Best Chardonnay at the California State Fair Commercial Wine Competition. The wine is sold for $1.99 at the Trader Joe's chain.

This article at the San Jose Mercury News says that it's not really a surprise that the inexpensive wine won, since judges often try to be contrarian at these events (especially if it's something fruity). The article also says that if you want to go down to Trader Joe's and buy a case you should be aware that the quality of the chardonnay can vary from bottle to bottle.

I'm not a white wine guy, but for $1.99 it has to be worth a try; and I'll still have money left over to buy some Doritos and Yodels!

Filed Under: Business, Raves & Reviews, Drink Recipes, Tastings
Tags: $1.99 wine, $1.99Wine, california state fair commercial wine, california wine, chardonnay, charles shaw wine, CharlesShawWine, trader joe's, two buck chuck, two dollar wine, TwoDollarWine, west coast, wine

Sponsored Links

Reader comments (Page 1 of 1)

Bob Mc

7-13-2007 @12:04PM Bob Mc said... I'm not rich, and I live near a Trader Joe's here in Napa. I've tried all the Chucks, and the chardonnay is the only one worth two bucks. The reds and the blanc are OK, but I wouldn't buy them for anything other than a picnic.
Reply

Jeff

7-13-2007 @12:20PM Jeff said... I buy wine at Trader Joe's all the time, and I have NEVER, ever seen one for sale at $1.99. The cheapest I've seen is 3-something.

Maybe stuff is just more expensive in Chicago.
Reply

Barry

7-13-2007 @12:46PM Barry said... Well, it's a crap shoot. Ideally you'd open the bottle in the parking lot to see if it is any good. If it is run back in and buy a case because the next time you get a bottle (red or white) it may suck. They make wine in huuuuuuge quantities at a time so quality is all over the map.
Reply

Rick Dobbs

7-13-2007 @1:20PM Rick Dobbs said... Well, here's what a State Fair Ribbon is worth.
Reply

Ryan

7-13-2007 @2:02PM Ryan said... I agree with Bob Mc. I can't do their reds (believe me, I want to like them!), but this 05 Chard is actually quite nice for 2 bucks. Having it around for a light drink on a hot day or even for some cooking is why I bought a case.
Reply

Rich

7-13-2007 @6:28PM Rich said... I'm not sure what a "Commercial Wine Competition" is but I bet the Napa wines that cost $100s aren't in it.
Reply

Jupiter

8-27-2007 @8:56PM Jupiter said... I always have at least a bottle of this in my fridge. My previous favourite wine cost about $20 (rarely I could find it on great sale for $14 or $17). This tastes as nice as that did. It's not stellar, but for an ordinary every-day wine for someone such as myself with little budget (and an admittedly unrefined pallate), it is nice. Not the best, but who can afford that? I always said why spend more ~ it all tastes like lighter fluid anyway. I've changed my mind ~ I do actually (mostly) like the Two Buck Chuck. Their reds are a bit iffey ~ sometimes good, but when bad, they're awful, but that's the nature of reds. White wine can at least be sweetened with a dash of juice if it makes you cringe.
Reply

Colin

8-29-2007 @1:50AM Colin said... Hopefully this will help California get out of its chardonnay slump. The Wall Street Journal has had a couple articles over the past year describing how poor even the pricey California chards have been the last decade or two. Why pay $60 for a crappy CA chard, when you can pay $2 and send a message to the overpriced CA wine companies?
It's time CA starts taking its chard seriously again, and if it takes me buying cases of Two Buck for the next few years, I'm all for it...as things are today, I have nothing to lose.
Reply

Jack

9-15-2007 @2:33AM Jack said... This post SO hurts my eyes.

"I'm not a white wine guy, but for $1.99 it has to be worth a try" - you mean just like owning a Yugo was worth a try? Just like invading Iraq was worth a try? Com'on Bob, what do you think the chances are of you getting a bottle (of the millions made) that tasted as good as the ones the judges tasted?

And to Commenter #9, above, "Why pay $60 for a crappy CA chard, when you can pay $2 and send a message to the overpriced CA wine companies?" - you're joking, right? How does buying a taco from a street vendor send a message to the owners of a one-star Michelin restaurant?


Reply

10 Comments / 1 Pages

Most Popular Stories

  • FDA Still Struggling to Define

    FDA Still Struggling to Define "Gluten-Free"Read More

  • This Omelet Recipe Is Written On the Egg Itself

    This Omelet Recipe Is Written On the Egg ItselfRead More

  • Why Jewish Food Disappoints

    Why Jewish Food DisappointsRead More

Latest Flickr Feed


Sponsored Links