California moves closer to trans-fat ban

by Nicole Weston, Posted Mar 7th 2007 @ 10:04AM

California has just taken another step towards passing a bill that would ban "the use of oils, margarine and shortening containing trans fats" from all restaurants and other food-serving businesses by 2009. As in the similar New York law, food not made on-site that is served in its original packaging (and therefore indicating the presence of trans fats) is exempt, as are meat and dairy products. California is the first state taking action against trans fats in continuing to pursue this legislation, which has almost reached the state Assembly. New York and Philadelphia, although both have ordinances, are small potatoes compared to the whole of the Golden State.

Predictably, representatives from the California Restaurant Association and the Grocery Manufacturers and Food Products Association say that the change will be detrimental to restaurateurs and will "lead to shortages of oils free of trans fats and force owners of small restaurants to pay higher prices for cooking oil." This has not, as yet, happened in other places with such ordinances and, because the change is to be a gradual one, there is more than enough time for producers to work out sources for trans-free products and for manufacturers of those products to increase their output. Other critics say that this is turning California into a nanny state, while those in favor of the ban say it is simply good sense to prohibit something so unhealthy.

Source

Filed Under: Health & Medical, Chefs & Restaurants, Restaurants
Tags: trans fats, west coast

Chew on This

Royal Wedding Cake Details Revealed! - YumSugar

Make Your Own Pop Tarts - CHOW
Denny's Introduces a Maple Bacon Sundae - Eater
Whole Foods Opening Bars in Stores - USA Today
Rules Of Bar Etiquette -- For The Bartender - HuffPost Food

Reader comments (Page 1 of 1)

3-07-2007 @2:24PM jesussaves said... As far as this subject goes on trans-fat ban. Once again we see goverment telling us what to do. This time its telling us how to eat and what to eat. Give me a break! I'm not saying that they are wrong, I'm saying if I want a large order of french fries, as an example I should have a right to order that. If you don't that's ok! that is your choice.

That's how I see it. Its just like smoking, two choices one part of a restaurant for smokers, and one part for non smokers.

So why ban all the trans-fat and cause all kinds of Problems. When goverment could leave it up to the restaurants to do both. So that you as a person can have the right to eat fries with fat or without fat.

Reply