Cauliflower gene offers health benefits

by Nicole Weston (Subscribe to Nicole Weston's posts)
Posted Feb 25th 2007 12:03PM
Filed under: Science, Farming, Did you know?, Health & Medical

Print Email More

Genetically modified foodstuffs do not have a very good public relations team working for them. Hearing that food has been genetically modified in some way will turn off most consumers because the assumption associated with it is that the food has been made more pest/disease resistant and less flavorful through unnatural means. Unnatural, in this instance, refers to a quickly forced change in a particular plant and not to a gradual evolution through selective breeding. The word does not have a positive connotation, yet in spite of that, not everything done with GM foods is a bad idea.

The US Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Research Service (USDA ARS) is currently working with a gene that "induce high levels of beta-carotene into food crops." The gene, named Or is responsible for the orange color of some cauliflower and "promotes high beta-carotene accumulation in various plant tissues." Beta-carotene, is processed by the body into Vitamin A, so an increase of its concentration in foods that are naturally low in it could make a significant impact on worldwide Vitamin A deficiencies, which affects approximately 250 million children worldwide. More studies (there have only been eight years' worth) are needed before any action is taken.

This isn't to say that GM foods are necessarily a good idea, but it does show that there are applications beyond inserting jellyfish genes to make food glow.

Tags: cauliflower, cloning, gene, genes, therapy, vegetables

Comments [1]

Read

Permalink

Print Email Twitter Facebook Digg AIM Share

Related Headlines

Romanesco - Feast Your Eyes (14 days ago - 5 Comments)

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

2-27-2007 @ 7:16AM

James Wachai said...

Genetically modified foods should be seen for what they are.This is what I always argue in my blog (http://www.gmoafrica.org/) People should not speculate about genetically modified foods. They should base their arguments on science. So far, no scientific study has found genetically modified food to be harmful to human beings.

#	Blogger	Posts	Cmts
1	Slashfood Editor	83	0
2	Alexa Weibel	52	2
3	Sarah LeTrent	36	0
4	Hanna Raskin	30	0
5	Emily Farris	20	0
6	Jennifer Lawinski	17	0
7	Sara Bonisteel	14	0
8	Michael Thomas Hastings	10	0
9	Jennifer Iserloh	7	0
10	Jose Ralat Maldonado	7	1
11	David Koeppel	7	0
12	Mike Pomranz	5	1
13	Max Shrem	5	0
14	Sarah Christine	5	0
15	LeNell Smothers	5	0
16	Erin Meister	5	0
17	Joshua M. Bernstein	5	2
18	John Devore	4	0
19	Kristine Hansen	4	0
20	Monika Bartyzel	4	0

Blogger

Posts

Cmts

Michael Thomas Hastings

The Tote Package: A Great-Looking Diaper Bag Olivia Newton-John Answers Your Questions Who Looks Like Charlie Brown?	Thanksgiving Leftovers: Healthy Post-Holiday Recipes Thanksgiving: The Year's Worst Diet-Buster? Denise Austin 3-Week Boot Camp: DVD Review
J. Crew Holiday Catalog - Jenna Lyons Gives StyleList a Sneak Peek A Holiday Gift Guide with Style - Design Guru Edition Holiday Gifts I Want - Marissa	Mysteries of "National Dog Show 2009," "Alton Brown Turkey," and "Ziggy Marley" Solved Lindsay Lohan to Stay on at Ungaro Paula Abdul Gets Her Pooches Painted
Store Your Paperwork On a Fabric Shelf? One $28 Frame, 5 Ways The First White House State Dinner Serves Up Modern Design	Florida Pig and Family May Be Pardoned Shelter Takes Pains to Unthaw Frozen Kitty PETA Thinks Next Uga Should Be a Robotic Dog