For years, doctors, nutritionists and even parents have told people that the key to getting more satisfaction from your food is to eat more slowly. Not only does this allow you to actually enjoy the flavors in your meal, but it was always said to give the brain time to recognize the fact that it was no longer hungry, which would in turn cause you to stop eating. Up until recently, there was no clinical evidence to support that decision.
Dr. Kathleen Melanson, of the University of Rhode Island in Kingston, changed all that by conducting a study on college age women to see how much different styles of eating affected their calorie intake. All the women were given a bowl of pasta with tomato and vegetable sauce after eating a 400-calorie breakfast and fasting for four hours. One group of women was given a large spoon and told to eat as quickly as possible, not pausing between bites. The other group was given a small spoon and told to pause in between each bite, setting down the spoon and chewing 15-20 times. The fast eaters ate 646 calories in 9 minutes, while the slower eaters ate only 579 calories in 29 minutes. The slower eaters also reported feeling fuller, longer.
Melanson estimates that eating slowly could reduce the number of calories a person eats by about 210 per day.

Broke Stars: 11 Celebrities Who Went Bankrupt
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Social Security Is Failing Even Faster Than We Thought
Man Says Starbucks Discriminated Against Him Because He Has Half An Arm
Chris Brown, Grammys 2012: Embattled Singer Slams Critics
Ford's clever Sports Illustrated Swimsuit ad features phantom model
Trace Adkins Reunites With College Crush, 30 Years Later
Lauren Scruggs Goes On Ski Vacation
Van Gogh's Starry Night modded into beautiful interactive light and sound show (video)
'Hooker Teacher' Forced To Resign, Now Can't Find Work
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die




12-04-2006 @2:22PM Nathan said... And if you take this study to its natural extreme opposite, you have evidence that supports the story right before it.
Reply
12-04-2006 @5:51PM Jeff said... er, isn't that common sense?
maybe it's just news because now we have an "official study"
:)
Reply
12-06-2006 @7:39PM red said... Um, duh.
Reply
12-04-2006 @4:17PM Tiff said... I always hear this but I wasn't sure if it worked or not. I DEFINITELY need to add this into my eating habits!!
Reply
12-04-2006 @7:25PM Kate said... I'm weary of studies of the obvious. "Scientists show that eating slowly results in food cooling to a lower temperature then when meal first began." There, guys. Your next assignment.
Reply
12-04-2006 @10:22PM calamari said... There's something odd about this study. Okay, slow eaters ate less even though they lingered over the meal -- so far, so good. But it's common wisdom that larger portions "cause" people to eat more:
http://www.slashfood.com/2006/11/03/binging-more-likely-when-eating-out/
So this study suggests that people *don't* eat to clean the plate if they eat slowly -- that is, that larger portions won't make a difference for slow eaters.
Reply