Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Hot on HuffPost Food:

See More Stories
Tell us what you think for a chance at $1000!


WSJ taste-tests 100 calorie packs

Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal described the difficult position that 100 calorie snack packs find themselves in. According to the WSJ, the problem is that if they taste too good, consumers will eat multiple packs at a sitting, so the companies have to make them taste just good enough to motivate customers to finish the bag. If the product is too bad, consumers might not be likely to purchase it in the future, so companies only have to keep people from spitting out their snacks. This is an industry niche that is not filled with award winning goodies by any means. A taste test done by staff picked out some of the best and worst options in a group of determinedly average candidates. Overall, Vitalicious products were preferred to other brands in taste and had overall fat contents lower than their competition, but here are the rest of the picks:

Nabisco 100 Calorie Packs

  • Best: Planters Peanut Butter Cookie Crisps
  • Worst: Chips Ahoy! Thin Crisps

Keebler/Sunshine Right Bites

  • Best: Fudge Shoppe Mini Fudge Stripes
  • Worst: Mini Cheez-Its

Vitalicious

  • Best: VitaCake
  • Worst: Muffin tops

Filed Under: Newspapers, Lists, New Products
Tags: 100 calorie snack packs, 100 calorie snacks, chips ahoy, keebler right bites, nabisco, snack packs, taste test, thin cripss, vita cake, vitalicious, vitalicious muffin tops, wall street journal, WallStreetJournal

Sponsored Links

Reader comments (Page 1 of 1)

lori

3-03-2006 @2:52PM lori said... the Shortbread sandies are the best with the planters coming in a close second
and the WORST in any category is th Ritz snack mix
there's some NASTY seasoning on it
Reply

SHerbitter

3-03-2006 @3:56PM SHerbitter said... Now, see -- I LOVE the Ritz snacks and the Cheez-Its (that the WSJ rates as "the worst") is one of my favorites. I agree about the shortbread sandies -- probably my favorite. To each his own!!!
Reply

Julie

3-03-2006 @5:36PM Julie said... I buy both the Oreo 100 calorie packs and the Chips Ahoy. They both taste really good for something that is supposed to be on the healthier side of snacking. Not only that but I give them to my daughter. She's 3 years old and doesn't need to be introduced to any of the "real" cookies and things out there. As long as she likes them and I know it's less fat and calories than giving her two regular Oreos, I'm fine with them.
Reply

skeptical

3-03-2006 @5:51PM skeptical said... Now I seriously doubt the manufactureres are actually concerned about the consumption rate of these snacks. That is, I doubt they care at all if a person were to eat multiple bags in one sitting. True, they are meant specifically for those who are trying to lose (or are watching) their weight. But I doubt THEY care if you eat more than the intended amount; after all, it's more income on their part.
Reply

4 Comments / 1 Pages

Most Popular Stories

  • FDA Still Struggling to Define

    FDA Still Struggling to Define "Gluten-Free"Read More

  • This Omelet Recipe Is Written On the Egg Itself

    This Omelet Recipe Is Written On the Egg ItselfRead More

  • Why Jewish Food Disappoints

    Why Jewish Food DisappointsRead More

Latest Flickr Feed


Sponsored Links