The main feature of today's New York Times food section is a foray into the world of cultivated truffles. Apparently
cultivated black truffles are more common than many consumers think and many restaurants care to admit.Other stories:
- Eric Asimov sings the praises of white Bordeaux.
- Mark Bittman does Moroccan chicken with green olives.
- Nigella Lawson returns with chickpea curry and herbed millet.
- Kim Severson talks about Louisiana's crawfish shortage.
- Frank Bruni visits Del Posto.
- Marian Burros gives an update on the ongoing meat-and-carbon-monoxide issue.

Broke Stars: 11 Celebrities Who Went Bankrupt
Social Security Is Failing Even Faster Than We Thought
Man Says Starbucks Discriminated Against Him Because He Has Half An Arm
Chris Brown, Grammys 2012: Embattled Singer Slams Critics
Ford's clever Sports Illustrated Swimsuit ad features phantom model
Trace Adkins Reunites With College Crush, 30 Years Later
Van Gogh's Starry Night modded into beautiful interactive light and sound show (video)
'Hooker Teacher' Forced To Resign, Now Can't Find Work
Nick Cannon Hospitalized: Star Reveals New Serious Health Condition
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'






3-01-2006 @12:24PM Filbert said... Are truffles really that good or is it an Emperor's Clothes thing? "Truffles are expensive, therefore they must be good." It's like all those Iron Chef competitors that use truffles (quite often it seems). Will the addition of a $75 truffle make your dish that much better? Or is it just the perception that it's better because, "Ooh, he used truffles!" To me, it sounds like a crutch, an easy cop out, to make your dish sound cooler and better than it might actually be.
Reply