We dished out a Sarah G. vs. Sarah G. food war, pitting Pittsburgh's pierogis against
oysters, pierogis against Seattle's raw and
salty oysters, Seattle's
Pan-Asian fusion cuisine against Pittsburgh's Polish (yes, again)
pierogis, Polish sausage against smoked
salmon.
We went further, chalking up ate (8) reasons why Pittsburgh is better than Seattle, or is it Seattle is better than Pittsburgh? Finally Sarah Gim rounded up her Pittsburgh talking points, probably assuming she'd sealed the deal.
Au contraire, my friend. I am here to say, uncontrovertibly, that Seattle's food rocks, from its seafood to its apples to its sweet, sweet Walla Walla sweets.
Now it's your turn. Lob in your volleys in the Seattle vs. Pittsburgh debate! After all the battling, which Sarah G. convinced you that her chosen city's cuisine rocks the NFL?
America's Most Hated Foods
Slashfood Ate (8): Ways to create the perfect cheese plate
A good trick for saving summer herbs for future use
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-06-2006 @ 11:57AM
B said...
Seattle wins the food war (kind of a consolation prize after the egg thier football team left in Detroit). Ground meat stuffed in pig intestine is no match for smoked salmon, and Pan-Asian food is much less likely to kill you than Polish food. Iron City beer beats Starbucks, but Seattle wins two out of three.
Reply
2-06-2006 @ 3:45PM
Jamie said...
That would be true if it weren't for Primanti's sandwiches, which are one of the best after-hours foods of all time. :-)
Reply