
We dished out a Sarah G. vs. Sarah G. food war, pitting Pittsburgh's pierogis against
oysters, pierogis against Seattle's raw and
salty oysters, Seattle's
Pan-Asian fusion cuisine against Pittsburgh's Polish (yes, again)
pierogis, Polish sausage against smoked
salmon.
We went further, chalking up ate (8) reasons why Pittsburgh is better than Seattle, or is it Seattle is better than Pittsburgh? Finally Sarah Gim rounded up her Pittsburgh talking points, probably assuming she'd sealed the deal.
Au contraire, my friend. I am here to say, uncontrovertibly, that Seattle's food rocks, from its seafood to its apples to its sweet, sweet Walla Walla sweets.
Now it's your turn. Lob in your volleys in the Seattle vs. Pittsburgh debate! After all the battling, which Sarah G. convinced you that her chosen city's cuisine rocks the NFL?

Broke Stars: 11 Celebrities Who Went Bankrupt
Social Security Is Failing Even Faster Than We Thought
Man Says Starbucks Discriminated Against Him Because He Has Half An Arm
Chris Brown, Grammys 2012: Embattled Singer Slams Critics
Ford's clever Sports Illustrated Swimsuit ad features phantom model
Trace Adkins Reunites With College Crush, 30 Years Later
Van Gogh's Starry Night modded into beautiful interactive light and sound show (video)
'Hooker Teacher' Forced To Resign, Now Can't Find Work
Nick Cannon Hospitalized: Star Reveals New Serious Health Condition
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'






2-06-2006 @3:45PM Jamie said... That would be true if it weren't for Primanti's sandwiches, which are one of the best after-hours foods of all time. :-)
Reply
2-06-2006 @11:57AM B said... Seattle wins the food war (kind of a consolation prize after the egg thier football team left in Detroit). Ground meat stuffed in pig intestine is no match for smoked salmon, and Pan-Asian food is much less likely to kill you than Polish food. Iron City beer beats Starbucks, but Seattle wins two out of three.
Reply